Criteria for evaluating the exam. Translation of exam points in Russian What to prepare for
From the 2014-2015 academic year, a final essay was introduced in the schools of the Russian Federation, which is written in December.
What does the final essay affect?
This is a graduation essay. The exam is compulsory for all graduates: you cannot graduate from school without it. For those who are going to enter the humanities faculties, this is an introductory work: it must be submitted to the university, which organizes the test itself and will give points from 0 to 10. 10 points is a lot. This means that the final winter composition can become decisive in the situation of the competition. So you need to treat him.
Final essay grading system
There will be no points for the exam at school. To graduate from school, you need to get a credit for work. Only the essay credit will be a pass to the rest of the exams. Those who do not cope with the essay are not allowed to take other exams. Those who cannot get the credit will be given the opportunity to retake. Later. In the spring.
Who will check the essays?
Your teachers will check the essays, so they will be your main advisers in preparation. If you enter the humanities faculties, the work will be checked again by the teachers of the university to which you apply.
Exam time
This is a complete exam. It will last three hours and fifty-five minutes (235 minutes).
Purpose of the essay: what does it test?
The essay should reveal the level of the graduate's speech culture, his erudition, personal maturity and the ability to reason based on literary material on the chosen topic. Thus, the purpose of the final essay is, first of all, to test speech competencies and the ability to refer to literary material, to choose the work (works) that best suits the problematic of the essay to reveal the topic (FIPI Project).
Your essay must be based on the works of Russian and (or) world literature.
Reliance on a work of fiction when writing an essay implies not just a reference to a particular literary text, but also an appeal to it at the level of argumentation, the use of examples related to the problems and themes of the works, the system of characters, etc.
To ensure the clarity of the requirements for the essay (assessment parameters), including the obligation to rely on works of domestic and world literature, each set is accompanied by the following instruction for graduates, placed on the examination sheet.
Evaluation criteria for the final essay
| Evaluation criteria | Points | K1. Relevance to the topic |
|---|---|
| The graduate in one form or another argues on the proposed topic, choosing a convincing way of its disclosure (for example, answers the question posed in the topic, or reflects on the proposed problem, or builds a statement on the basis of theses related to the topic, etc.), communicative the idea of the composition is clearly expressed. | 2 |
| The graduate discusses superficially on the proposed topic, the communicative intention of the essay is traced. | 1 |
| The essay does not correspond to the topic, and / or the communicative intent of the essay is not traced. | 0 |
| K2. Attracting literary material | |
| When disclosing the topic of an essay, a graduate builds reasoning on the basis of at least one work of domestic or world literature of his own choice, defining his own way of using literary material; shows a different level of its comprehension: from elements of semantic analysis (for example, topics, problems, plot, characters, etc.) to a complex analysis of a literary text in the unity of form and content; no more than 1 factual error was made related to knowledge of the literary material (an error in the spelling of the author and the title of the work, the names of the characters and toponyms of the work, in the presentation of the storyline, literary and historical facts, etc.) | 2 |
| The graduate builds reasoning based on literary material, but is limited to general statements about a work of art; and / or is limited to a simple retelling of the work of art; and / or 2-4 factual errors associated with knowledge of the literary material were made. |
1 |
| The essay was written without the involvement of literary material, or literary works are only mentioned in the work, without becoming a support for reasoning, and / or the composition contains 5 or more factual errors. |
0 |
| K3. Composition | |
| The work is distinguished by compositional integrity, the logical presentation of thoughts and the proportionality of the parts, there are no violations of the sequence and unreasonable repetitions within the semantic parts. | 2 |
| The work is distinguished by compositional integrity, its parts are logically interconnected, but within the semantic parts there are violations of the sequence and unreasonable repetitions, and / or the compositional intention is traced in the essay, but there are violations of the compositional connection between the semantic parts, and / or the thought repeats itself and does not develop. |
1 |
| Gross logical violations interfere with understanding the meaning of what has been written, or there is no thesis-proof part, or the argumentation is not convincing. | 0 | K4. Speech quality |
| The graduate accurately expresses thoughts, using a variety of vocabulary and various grammatical constructions, if necessary, uses terms appropriately, avoids cliches. | 2 |
| The graduate accurately expresses thoughts, but his speech is characterized by the poverty of the vocabulary and the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech. | 1 |
| Poor speech quality significantly complicates the understanding of the meaning, or the essay is written in a poor, primitive language, or is replete with vernacular expressions and vulgarisms. | 0 | K5. Originality of the composition |
| The graduate demonstrates a creative, non-standard approach to the disclosure of the topic (the essay notes interesting thoughts, or unexpected and at the same time convincing arguments, or fresh observations, etc.) or the brightness of the style. | 1 |
| The graduate does not demonstrate independence of thought, and / or creative, non-standard approach, and / or originality of style. | 0 | K6. Speech norms |
| No more than 2 speech errors were made. | 2 |
| 3-4 speech errors were made. | 1 |
| 5 or more speech errors were made. | 0 | K7. Spelling norms |
| There are no spelling errors, or 1 blunder has been made. | 3 |
| 2-3 spelling mistakes were made. | 2 |
| 4-5 spelling mistakes were made. | 1 |
| More than 5 spelling mistakes were made. | 0 | K8. Punctuation norms |
| There are no punctuation errors, or 1 blunder was made. | 3 |
| 2-3 punctuation errors were made. | 2 |
| 4-5 punctuation errors were made. | 1 |
| More than 5 punctuation errors were made. | 0 | K9. Grammar norms |
| No more than 2 grammatical mistakes were made. | 2 |
| 3-4 grammatical mistakes were made. | 1 |
| 5 or more grammatical mistakes were made. | 0 | K10. Actual accuracy in background material |
| There are no actual errors. | 1 |
| There were one or more factual errors in the background material. | 0 | MAXIMUM POINT | 20 |
The punctuation of the document is preserved.
| № | Criteria for evaluating the answer to task C1 | Points |
I |
||
K1 |
Formulation of source code problems |
|
| The examinee (in one form or another in any of the parts of the essay) correctly formulated one of the problems of the original text. There are no actual errors in understanding and formulating the problem |
1 | |
| The examinee was unable to correctly formulate any of the problems in the original text. |
0 | |
K2 |
Commentary on the formulated problem of the source text |
|
|
The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the source text. The examinee gave at least 2 examples from the text read that are important for understanding the problem. |
3 | |
|
The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the source text. The examinee gave 1 example from the text read, which is important for understanding the problem. |
2 | |
|
The text problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the original text, but the examinee did not give a single example from the text read that is important for understanding the problem, or there is one factual error in the comment, related to understanding the problem of the original text |
1 | |
|
The problem formulated by the examinee is not commented on or commented without relying on the original text, or the commentary made more than one factual error related to understanding the original text, or commented on another, |
0 | |
K3 |
Reflection of the position of the author of the source text |
|
|
The examinee correctly formulated the position of the author (narrator) of the source text on the commented issue. |
1 | |
| The position of the author of the original text by the examinee is formulated incorrectly, or the position of the author of the original text is not formulated |
0 | |
K4 |
Argumentation by the examinee of their own opinion on the problem |
|
|
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave at least 2 arguments, one of which was taken from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature) |
3 | |
|
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave at least 2 arguments, relying on knowledge, life experience), or gave only 1 argument from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature |
2 | |
|
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave 1 argument), relying on knowledge, life experience |
1 | |
| The examinee formulated his opinion on the problem posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), but did not give arguments, or the examinee's opinion is stated only formally (for example: "I agree / disagree with the author"), or the examinee's opinion is not reflected at all in the work |
0 | |
II |
Speech design of the essay |
|
K5 |
Semantic integrity, speech coherence and consistency of presentation |
|
|
The examinee's work is characterized by semantic integrity, speech coherence and consistency of presentation: |
2 | |
|
The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, coherence and consistency of presentation, |
1 | |
|
In the work of the examinee, a communicative intention is visible, but more than one logical error was made, and / or there are two cases of violation of paragraph articulation of the text |
0 | |
K6 |
Accuracy and expressiveness of speech |
|
| The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, the variety of the grammatical structure of speech. * The examinee receives the highest score on this criterion only if the highest score is obtained according to the K10 criterion |
2 | |
|
The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, but the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech is traced, or the work of the examinee is characterized by a variety of grammatical structure of speech, but there are violations of the accuracy of the expression of thoughts |
1 | |
| The work of the examinee is distinguished by the poverty of the vocabulary and the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech | 0 | |
III |
Literacy |
|
K7 |
Compliance with spelling norms |
|
| no spelling errors (or 1 blunder) | 3 | |
| no more than 2 mistakes were made | 2 | |
| 3-4 mistakes were made | 1 | |
| more than 4 mistakes were made |
0 | |
K8 |
Compliance with punctuation norms |
|
| no punctuation errors (or 1 blunder) | 3 | |
| 1-3 mistakes were made | 2 | |
| 4-5 mistakes were made | 1 | |
| more than 5 mistakes were made |
0 | |
K9 |
Compliance with language norms |
|
| no grammatical errors | 2 | |
| 1-2 mistakes were made | 1 | |
| more than 2 mistakes were made |
0 | |
K10 |
Compliance with speech norms |
|
| no more than 1 speech error was made | 2 | |
| 2-3 mistakes were made | 1 | |
| more than 3 mistakes were made |
0 | |
K11 |
Compliance with ethical standards |
|
| there are no ethical mistakes in work | 1 | |
| ethical mistakes were made (1 or more) |
0 | |
K12. |
Maintaining factual accuracy in background material |
|
| no actual errors in background material | 1 | |
| made mistakes of fact (1 or more) in the background material |
0 | |
| The maximum number of points for all written work (K1-K12) | 24 |
When assessing literacy (K7-K10), the volume of the essay should be taken into account 1.
1. The assessment norms indicated in the table are designed for an essay with a volume of 150-300 words 2.
2. If the essay contains less than 70 words, then such work is not counted and is estimated at 0 points, the task is considered unfulfilled.
When evaluating an essay with a volume of 70 to 150 words, the number of permissible errors of four types (K7-K10) decreases.
2 points for these criteria are given in the following cases:
K7 - no spelling errors (or one blunder was made);
K8 - no punctuation errors (or one minor mistake was made). 1 point according to these criteria is given in the following cases:
K7 - no more than two mistakes were made;
K8 - one or three mistakes were made;
K9 - no grammatical errors;
K10 - no more than one speech error was made.
The highest score according to the K7-K12 criteria for work from 70 to 150 words is not given.
If the essay is a retold or completely rewritten source text without any comments, then such work on all aspects of verification (K1K12) is estimated at 0 points.
If the work, which is a rewritten or retold of the original text, contains fragments of text
of the examinee, then only the number of words that belongs to the examinee are taken into account when checking.
A work written without reference to the text read (not according to this text) is not evaluated.
1 When counting words, both independent and service parts of speech are taken into account.
Any sequence of words written without a space is counted (for example, “all the same” - one word, “all the same” - two words). Initials with a surname are considered one word (for example, "M.Yu. Lermontov" - one word). Any other characters, in particular numbers, are not taken into account in the calculation (for example, "5 years" - one word, "five years" - two
the words).
2 If the essay contains partially or completely rewritten by the examinee the text of the review of task 24 and / or information about the author of the text, then the volume of such work is determined without taking into account the text of the review and / or information about the author of the text.
In accordance with the Procedure for conducting state final certification for educational programs of secondary general education (order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated December 26, 2013 No. 1400, registered by the Ministry of Justice of Russia February 03, 2014 No. 31205)
"61. According to the results of the first and second examinations, the experts independently set points for each answer to the tasks of the exam paper of the Unified State Examination with a detailed answer ...
62. In case of a significant discrepancy in the points given by two experts, a third check is assigned. A significant difference in scores was determined in the assessment criteria for the corresponding academic subject.
The expert carrying out the third check is provided with information about the points given by the experts who have previously checked the examination paper. "
After checking the USE assignments in the Russian language, a primary score is given for their completion: from 0 to 57. Each assignment is evaluated by a certain number of points: the more difficult the assignment, the more points you can get for it. For the correct completion of tasks in the exam in the Russian language, from 1 to 5 points are given, depending on the complexity of the task. In this case, for an essay, you can get from 0 to 24 points.
After that, the primary score is converted into a test score, which is indicated in the USE certificate. It is this point that is used for admission to higher educational institutions. Transfer of Unified State Exam points carried out using a special scale of points.
Also, according to the score for the exam, you can determine the approximate mark on a five-point scale that a student would receive for completing tasks in the Russian language on the exam.
Below is the scale for translating USE points in Russian: Primary scores, test scores and a rough estimate.
Unified State Exam points translation scale: Russian
The minimum test score for admission to higher educational institutions in the Russian language is 36.
| Primary score | Test score | Grade |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 22 | |
| 10 | 24 | 3 |
| 11 | 26 | |
| 12 | 28 | |
| 13 | 30 | |
| 14 | 32 | |
| 15 | 34 | |
| 16 | 36 | |
| 17 | 38 | |
| 18 | 39 | |
| 19 | 40 | |
| 20 | 41 | |
| 21 | 43 | |
| 22 | 44 | |
| 23 | 45 | |
| 24 | 46 | |
| 25 | 48 | |
| 26 | 49 | |
| 27 | 50 | |
| 28 | 51 | |
| 29 | 53 | |
| 30 | 54 | |
| 31 | 55 | |
| 32 | 56 | |
| 33 | 57 | 4 |
| 34 | 59 | |
| 35 | 60 | |
| 36 | 61 | |
| 37 | 62 | |
| 38 | 64 | |
| 39 | 65 | |
| 40 | 66 | |
| 41 | 67 | |
| 42 | 69 | |
| 43 | 70 | |
| 44 | 71 | |
| 45 | 72 | 5 |
| 46 | 73 | |
| 47 | 76 | |
| 48 | 78 | |
| 49 | 81 | |
| 50 | 83 | |
| 51 | 86 | |
| 52 | 88 | |
| 53 | 91 | |
| 54 | 93 | |
| 55 | 96 | |
| 56 | 98 | |
| 57 | 100 |
EVALUATION CRITERIA
EXAM IN RUSSIAN LANGUAGE IN 11 GRADES (USE)
For the correct execution of all assignments examination work can be obtained as much as possible 55 primary points.
For the correct execution of each tasks parts 1 (except for tasks 7, 15 and 24) the graduate receives 1 point each... 0 points are given for an incorrect answer or lack of it.
For completing assignments 7 can be exposed from 0 to 5 points... For each correctly indicated number corresponding to the number from the list, the examinee receives 1 point (5 points: no mistakes; 4 points: 1 mistake was made; 3 points: 2 mistakes were made; 2 points: 2 numbers were indicated correctly; 1 point: correctly indicated only one digit; 0 points: completely wrong answer, i.e. wrong sequence of digits or its absence). The order in which the numbers are written in the answer matters.
For completing assignments 15 can be exposed from 0 to 2 points... For each correctly indicated number corresponding to the number of the answer, the examinee receives 1 point. If 2 numbers are correct, the examinee gets 2 points.
For completing assignments 24 can be exposed from 0 to 4 points... For each correctly indicated number corresponding to the number of a term from the list, the examinee receives 1 point (4 points: no mistakes; 3 points: 1 mistake was made; 2 points: 2 mistakes were made; 1 point: only one number was correctly indicated; 0 points: completely wrong answer, that is, wrong sequence of numbers or its absence.
Maximum points that can be obtained by a student who has completed the assignment correctly part 2, is 23 points.
Evaluation criteria for an assignment with a detailed answer (essay)
Criteria for evaluating the answer to task C1
Points
I
Content of the essay
K1
Formulation of source code problems
The examinee (in one form or another in any of the parts of the essay) correctly formulated one of the problems of the original text.
There are no actual errors in understanding and formulating the problem
1
The examinee was unable to correctly formulate any of the problems in the original text.
0
K2
Commentary on the formulated problem of the source text
The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the source text. Factual errors related to understanding the problem of the original text, no comments
2
The problem formulated by the examinee is not commented on,or
more than 1 factual error was made in the comments related to the understanding of the original text, or commented on another problem not formulated by the examinee,or
as comments, a simple retelling of the text or its fragment is given,
or
a large fragment of the original text is cited as comments
0
K3
The examinee correctly formulated the position of the author (narrator) of the source text on the commented issue.
There are no factual errors related to understanding the position of the author of the original text.
1
0
K4
Argumentation by the examinee of their own opinion on the problem
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave at least 2 arguments, one of which was taken from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature)
3
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave at least 2 arguments, relying on knowledge, life experience), or gave only 1 argument from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature
2
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (gave 1 argument), relying on knowledge, life experience
1
The examinee formulated his opinion on the problem posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), but did not give arguments, or the examinee's opinion is stated only formally (for example: "I agree / disagree with the author"), or the examinee's opinion is not reflected at all in the work
0
II
Speech design of the essay
K5
Semantic integrity, speech coherence and consistency of presentation
The examinee's work is characterized by semantic integrity, speech coherence and consistency of presentation:
- there are no logical errors, the sequence of presentation is not broken;
- in the work there are no violations of paragraph division text
2
The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, coherence and consistency of presentation, but 1 logical error was made, and / or there is 1 violation of the paragraph division of the text in the work
1
In the work of the examinee, a communicative intention is visible,
but more than 1 logical error was made,
and / or
there are 2 cases of violation of the paragraph articulation of the text
0
K6
Accuracy and expressiveness of speech
The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, the variety of the grammatical structure of speech.
* The examinee receives the highest score on this criterion only if the highest score is obtained according to the K10 criterion
2
The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, but the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech is traced, or the work of the examinee is characterized by a variety of grammatical structure of speech, but there are violations of the accuracy of the expression of thoughts
1
The work of the examinee is distinguished by the poverty of the vocabulary and the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech
0
III
Literacy
K7
Compliance with spelling norms
no spelling errors (or 1 blunder)
3
no more than 2 mistakes were made
2
3-4 mistakes were made
1
more than 4 mistakes were made
0
K8
Compliance with punctuation norms
no punctuation errors (or 1 blunder)
3
1–3 mistakes were made
2
4-5 mistakes were made
1
more than 5 mistakes were made
0
K9
Compliance with language norms
no grammatical errors
2
1-2 mistakes were made
1
more than 2 mistakes were made
0
K10
Compliance with speech norms
no more than 1 speech error was made
2
2-3 mistakes were made
1
more than 3 mistakes were made
0
K11
Compliance with ethical standards
there are no ethical mistakes in work
1
ethical mistakes were made (1 or more)
0
K12.
Maintaining factual accuracy in background material
no actual errors in background material
1
made mistakes of fact (1 or more) in the background material
0
The maximum number of points for all written work (K1-K12)
When assessing literacy (K7 – K10), the volume of the essay should be taken into account. The grading norms shown in the table are designed for an essay with a volume of 150-300 words.
If the essay contains less than 70 words, then such work is not counted and is estimated at zero points, the task is considered unfulfilled.
When evaluating an essay in volume 70 to 150 words number of errors allowed four types (K7-K10) decreases.
2 points for these criteria are given in the following cases:
K7 - no spelling errors (or 1 blunder was made);
K8 - no punctuation errors (or 1 minor mistake).
1 point for these criteria is given in the following cases:
K7 - no more than 2 mistakes were made;
К8 - 1–3 mistakes were made;
K9 - no grammatical errors;
K10 - no more than 1 speech error was made.
Highest mark by criteria K7-K12 for work in volume 70 to 150 words not put.
If the essay is a retold or completely rewritten of the original text without any comments, then such work on all aspects of the check (K1-K12) is estimated at zero points.
If the work, which is a rewritten or retold source text, contains fragments of the examinee's text, then only the number of words that belongs to the examinee is taken into account during the check. A work written without reference to the text read (not according to this text) is not evaluated.
GOOD LUCK TO YOU,
GRADUATES!
Next year, the Russian government decided to amend the state compulsory exam of the Unified State Exam. It is planned to introduce the oral part of the USE in the Russian language 2017. Algorithms for the oral part are already there. As with the delivery of foreign languages orally, the student listens to the assignment for twenty minutes and answers five questions, describing the picture and asking questions. Then the reviewers listen to the student's recording and give a grade. This model of the oral part of the exam in the Russian language suits the experts. The only thing that is required from the government of the country is to quickly and efficiently equip premises for passing this type of exam. Because, unlike foreign languages, about 700 thousand applicants pass Russian annually. The only aesthetic inconvenience is the passing of an oral exam for children with speech impairments, but this is now being considered by teachers to improve the overall delivery system.
