Tsarist expertise: expectations and disappointments. What is known at the moment. Complete burning is doubtful

On Monday, November 27, 2017, at the Moscow Sretensky Stavropegic male monastery the conference “The case of the murder of the Tsar's family: new examinations and materials. Discussion "devoted to the study of the results of the study of the remains found near Yekaterinburg.

The conference was chaired by His Holiness Patriarch Kirill of Moscow and All Russia. The conference was attended by members, bishops of the Russian Orthodox Church, invited experts.

introduction His Holiness Patriarch Kirill

Opening remarks by Bishop Tikhon of Yegoryevsk

Marina Viktorovna Molodtsova,
Senior Investigator for Particularly Important Cases of the First Investigation Department of the Main Directorate for Investigation of Particularly Important Cases of the Investigative Committee Russian Federation
“On the shortcomings of the previous investigation and the need to resume the investigation in the fall of 2015. On the progress of the investigation of the criminal case and the results of certain forensic examinations "

,
Candidate of Sciences in Biology, Senior Researcher, Research Institute and Museum of Anthropology, Moscow state university them. M.V. Lomonosov
"Preliminary results of a comprehensive forensic anthropological examination"

,
Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Honored Doctor of the Russian Federation, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Deputy Head for Scientific Work of the Bureau of Forensic Medicine
Health Committee of the Government of the Leningrad Region
“Results of forensic medical examination. On the possibility of complete burning (destruction) of bodies under specified conditions, gunshot wounds on the remains "

,
Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Laureate of the Russian Government Prize, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor
"Characteristics of the dentition and X-ray cephalometric analysis of the structure of the facial skeleton in" Yekaterinburg remains "(forensic dental research)"

Sergey Alekseevich Nikitin,
doctor, forensic expert, chief specialist in the field of personal identification and anthropological reconstruction of the Bureau of Forensic Medicine, Moscow Department of Health
"Expert examinations of skulls No. 7 and No. 4, as well as teeth found in the 2007 burial."

Alexey Sergeevich Abramov,
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Senior Expert of the Department of Biomedical Research of the Department of Organization of Expert and Criminalistic Activities of the Main Directorate of Criminalistics of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation
"Expert studies in 3D format of skull No. 7 and skull No. 4, as well as analysis of available data on the burning of bodies under various circumstances"

Victor Nikolaevich Zvyagin,
Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Medical and Criminalistic Identification of the Russian Center for Forensic Medicine of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
"Research on the burned remains"

Discussion and discussion of previous reports
On anthropological issues

Alexander Borisovich Bezborodov,
Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor, Acting Rector of the Russian State University for the Humanities, Director of the Historical and Archival Institute of the Russian State University for the Humanities
"The fate of the remains of the Romanov family as a political problem in the Soviet Union"

Vasily Stepanovich Khristoforov,
Doctor of Law, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Former Head of the Department of Registration and Archival Funds of the FSB of Russia
"Archival materials of the FSB of Russia about the" Yekaterinburg events ": from versions to proofs"

Lyudmila Anatolyevna Lykova,
Doctor of Historical Sciences, Chief Specialist of the Russian State Archive of Social and Political History
"Actions of the participants of the" Yekaterinburg events "on Ganina Yama and Porosyonkovy Log"

​

,
Candidate of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Auxiliary and Special Historical Disciplines of the Historical and Archival Institute of the Russian State University for the Humanities
“The historical reliability of materials from the investigation of N.А. Sokolov and the validity of the conclusions made by him and other authors "

Final discussion

According to the official history, on the night of July 16-17, 1918, Nicholas II, along with his wife and children, was shot. After the burial was opened and the remains were identified in 1998, they were reburied in the tomb of the Peter and Paul Cathedral in St. Petersburg. However, then the Russian Orthodox Church did not confirm their authenticity.

“I cannot rule out that the church will recognize the royal remains as genuine if convincing evidence of their authenticity is found and if the examination is open and honest,” Metropolitan Hilarion of Volokolamsk said in July this year. In December, all the conclusions of the Investigative Committee and the ROC commission will be considered by the Bishops' Council. It is he who will decide on the attitude of the church to the Yekaterinburg remains.

An almost detective story with the remains

As you know, in the burial in 1998 of the remains royal family The Russian Orthodox Church did not participate, explaining this by the fact that the church is not sure whether the real remains of the royal family are buried. The ROC refers to the book of Kolchak's investigator Nikolai Sokolov, who concluded that all the bodies were burned. Some of the remains collected by Sokolov at the burning site are stored in Brussels, in the church of St. Job the Long-suffering, and they have not been examined.

The researchers were first directed to the place where the remains were found (on the Old Koptyakovskaya road) by a note from Yurovsky, in which he describes in detail where and how he buried the bodies of the royal family. But why did the malicious murderer give a detailed report to the descendants, where they should look for evidence of the crime? Moreover, a number of modern historians put forward a version that Yurovsky belonged to an occult sect and was certainly not interested in the further veneration of the holy relics by believers. If he wanted to confuse the investigation in this way, then he definitely achieved his goal - the case of the murder of Nicholas II and his family under the symbolic number 18666 has been shrouded in an aura of secrecy for many years and contains a lot of contradictory data

Is Yurovsky's note, on the basis of which the authorities were looking for a burial, genuine? And now, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor Buranov, in the archive finds a handwritten note written by Mikhail Nikolayevich Pokrovsky, and by no means Yakov Mikhailovich Yurovsky. This grave is clearly indicated there. That is, the note is a priori fake. Pokrovsky was the first director of Rosarkhiv. It was used by Stalin when it was necessary to rewrite history. He has a famous expression: "History is politics turned to the past." Since Yurovsky's note is a forgery, it was impossible to find a burial from it.

And now, in the coming year of the 100th anniversary of the execution of the Romanov family, the ROC has been instructed to give a final answer to all the dark places of the execution near Yekaterinburg. To obtain a final answer, research has been carried out under the auspices of the Russian Orthodox Church for several years. Once again, historians, geneticists, graphologists, pathologists and other specialists double-check the facts, once again powerful scientific forces and the forces of the prosecutor's office are involved, and all these actions again take place under a dense veil of secrecy.

But at the same time, no one remembers that after the capture of Yekaterinburg by whites, three commissions of whites took turns to make an unambiguous conclusion - there was no execution. Neither red nor white wanted to disclose this information. The Bolsheviks were interested in the tsar's money, and Kolchak declared himself the Supreme Ruler of Russia, which could not be with a living tsar. Prior to investigator Sokolov, the only investigator who published a book about the execution of the royal family, investigators Malinovsky, Nametkin (his archive was burned along with his house), Sergeev (removed from the case and killed) worked. Investigative commissions cited facts and evidence that refuted the execution. But they were soon forgotten, since the 4th commission of Sokolov and Dieteriks, in fact, fabricated the case of the execution of the Romanovs. They did not bring any facts to prove their theory, just as the investigators did not bring any facts in the 90s.

In the fall of 2015, investigators resumed their investigation into the death of members of the Romanov family. Currently, research on genetic identification is being carried out by four independent groups of scientists. Two of them are foreign, working directly with the Russian Orthodox Church. At the beginning of July 2017, the secretary of the church commission for the study of the results of the study of the remains found near Yekaterinburg, Bishop Tikhon (Shevkunov) of Yegoryevsk, reported that a large number of new circumstances and new documents had been revealed. For example, an order from Sverdlov to shoot Nicholas II was found. In addition, according to the results recent research criminologists confirmed that the remains of the tsar and tsarina belonged to them, since a trace was suddenly found on the skull of Nicholas II, which is interpreted as a trace from a saber strike he received while visiting Japan. As for the queen, she was identified by dentists by the world's first porcelain veneers on platinum pins. At present, examinations are also being carried out to establish the authenticity of the remains found in 2007, possibly of Tsarevich Alexei and Grand Duchess Maria.

Although, if you open the conclusion of the commission, written before the burial of 1998, it says: the bones of the sovereign's skull are so destroyed that the characteristic callus cannot be found. In the same report, severe damage to the teeth of the alleged remains of Nicholas from paradontosis was noted, since this person never been to the dentist. This confirms that it was not the tsar who was shot, since the records of the Tobolsk dentist, to whom Nikolai contacted, remained. In addition, I have not yet found an explanation for the fact that the growth of the skeleton of "Princess Anastasia" is 13 centimeters more than her lifetime growth. Shevkunov did not say a word about genetic examination, and this despite the fact that genetic research in 2003 conducted by Russian and American specialists, showed that the genome of the body of the alleged empress and her sister Elizaveta Fedorovna does not match, which means that there is no relationship.

In addition, in the museum of the city of Otsu (Japan) there are things left after being wounded by the policeman of Nicholas II. They contain biological material that can be examined. According to them, Japanese geneticists from the Tatsuo Nagai group proved that the DNA of the remains of "Nicholas II" from near Yekaterinburg (and his family) does not coincide 100% with the DNA of biomaterials from Japan. The publication by Japanese geneticists of the results of a study of human remains, which the official Russian authorities recognized as the remains of Nikolai Romanov's family, made a lot of noise. After analyzing the DNA structure of the Yekaterinburg remains and comparing them with the DNA analysis of the brother of Nicholas II, Grand Duke Georgy Romanov, the nephew of Emperor Tikhon Kulikovsky-Romanov, and DNA taken from sweat particles from the imperial clothes, professor at the Tokyo Institute of Microbiology Tatsuo Nagai came to the conclusion that the remains found near Yekaterinburg do not belong to Nicholas II and his family members. The results of this examination showed the obvious incompetence of the entire government commission, which was created under the leadership of Boris Nemtsov. Tatsuo Nagai's findings are a very strong argument that is difficult to refute.

This gave special weight to the arguments of that group of scientists, historians and geneticists, who are sure that in 1998 absolutely alien remains were buried in the Peter and Paul Fortress under the guise of an imperial family. Neither the leadership of the Russian Church, nor representatives of the Romanov family came to the pretentious burial of the Yekaterinburg remains. Moreover, then Patriarch Alexy II took the floor from Boris Yeltsin that he would not call the remains tsarist.

There are also the results of a genetic examination of the President of the International Forensic Association, Mr. Bonte from Dusseldorf. If you believe the German scientists, these are the remains of the Filatovs, doubles of Nicholas II. Nicholas II had seven families of doubles. The double system began with Alexander the First. It is historically known that there were two attempts on his life. Both times he remained alive, because doubles died. Alexander II did not have doubles. Alexander III had doubles after the famous train crash in Borki. Nicholas II had doubles after Bloody Sunday 1905. Moreover, these were specially selected families. Only at the last moment did a very narrow circle of people know which route and in which carriage Nikolai II would go. And so the same departure of all three carriages took place. In which of them Nicholas II was sitting is unknown. Documents about this are in the archives of the third department of the office of His Imperial Majesty. The Bolsheviks, having seized the archive in 1917, naturally received the names of all their doubles.

Perhaps the “remains of the royal family” were created from the remains of the Filatovs in 1946? It is known that in 1946 a resident of Denmark, Anna Andersen, tried to get the royal gold. Having started the second process of recognizing herself as Anastasia. The first trial did not end with anything, it lasted until the mid-30s. Then she paused and in 1946 again filed a lawsuit. Stalin, apparently, decided that it was better to make a grave where "Anastasia" would lie, than to explain with the West on these issues.

Further, the very place of execution of the Romanovs, the Ipatiev house, was demolished in 1977. In the mid-70s of the XX century, the government of the USSR was greatly concerned about the increased attention of foreigners to the house of the engineer Ipatiev. In 1978, two round dates were outlined at once: the 110th anniversary of the birth of Nicholas II and the 60th anniversary of his assassination. In order to avoid the excitement around the Ipatiev house, the chairman of the KGB, Yuri Andropov, made a proposal to demolish it. The final decision to destroy the mansion was made by Boris Yeltsin, who was then the first secretary of the Sverdlovsk Regional Committee of the Communist Party.

The Ipatiev house, which stood for almost 90 years, was razed to the ground in September 1977. For this, the destroyers took 3 days, a bulldozer and a ball-baba. The official pretext for the destruction of the building was the planned reconstruction of the city center. But it is possible that this is not at all the case - the microparticles that meticulous researchers could find could already at that time refute the legend about the execution of the royal family, and give other versions of events and their figurants! Then there was already, albeit inaccurate, genetic analysis.

Financial background

As you know, in the bank of the Baring brothers, there is gold, the personal gold of Nicholas II, weighing five and a half tons. There is a long-term study of Professor Vladlen Sirotkin (MGIMO) "Foreign gold of Russia" (Moscow, 2000), where the gold and other holdings of the Romanov family, accumulated in the accounts of Western banks, are also estimated at at least 400 billion dollars, and together with investments of more than $ 2 trillion! In the absence of heirs from the Romanovs, the closest relatives turn out to be members of the English royal family ... These are whose interests may be the background of many events of the 19th and 21st centuries ... But the bank cannot give them this gold until Nicholas II is declared dead. According to UK law, the absence of a corpse and the absence of wanted documents means that the person is alive.

By the way, it is unclear (or, on the contrary, understandable) why the royal house of England three times refused the Romanov family asylum. And this despite the fact that the mothers of George V and Nicholas II were sisters. In the surviving correspondence, Nicholas II and George V call each other "Nika's cousin" and "Georgie's cousin" - they were cousins, almost peers, spent a lot of time together and were very similar in appearance.

At that time, in England, as collateral for war loans, there were 440 tons of gold from the gold reserves of Russia and 5.5 tons of personal gold of Nicholas II. Now think about it: if the royal family died, then who would get the gold? The closest relatives! Isn't that the reason cousin Georgie's family refused to admit cousin Nicky? To get gold, its owners had to die. Officially. And now all this must be connected with the burial of the royal family, which will officially testify that the owners of untold riches are dead.

Versions of life after death

The first version: near Yekaterinburg, the royal family was shot, and its remains, with the exception of Alexei and Maria, were reburied in St. Petersburg. The remains of these children were found in 2007, all examinations were carried out on them, and they, apparently, will be buried on the day of the 100th anniversary of the tragedy. When confirming this version, for accuracy, it is necessary to once again identify all the remains and repeat all examinations, especially genetic and pathological ones.

The second version: the royal family was not shot, but was scattered across Russia and all family members died of natural causes, having lived their lives in Russia or abroad, while in Yekaterinburg a family of doubles was shot.

The surviving members of the royal family were watched by people from the KGB, where a special department was created for this, which was disbanded during perestroika. The archive of this department has been preserved. The royal family Stalin saved - the royal family was evacuated from Yekaterinburg through Perm to Moscow and fell into the disposal of Trotsky, then the people's commissar of defense. To further save the royal family, Stalin carried out a whole operation, stealing it from Trotsky's people and taking them to Sukhumi, to a specially built house next to the former house of the royal family. From there, all family members were assigned to different places Maria and Anastasia were taken to the Glinskaya desert (Sumy region), then Maria was transported to the Nizhny Novgorod region, where she died of illness on May 24, 1954. Anastasia subsequently married Stalin's personal bodyguard and lived very secluded on a small farm, died

June 27, 1980 in the Volgograd region. The eldest daughters, Olga and Tatiana, were sent to Serafimo-Diveevsky convent- The empress was settled not far from the girls. But they did not live here for long. Olga, having traveled through Afghanistan, Europe and Finland, settled in Vyritsa, Leningrad Region, where she died on January 19, 1976. Tatyana lived partly in Georgia, partly on the territory of the Krasnodar Territory, was buried in the Krasnodar Territory, died on September 21, 1992. Alexei and his mother lived at their dacha, then Alexei was transported to Leningrad, where he was "given" a biography, and the whole world recognized him as the party and Soviet leader Alexei Nikolaevich Kosygin (Stalin sometimes called him tsarevich in front of everyone). Nicholas II lived and died in Nizhny Novgorod(December 22, 1958), and the queen died in the village of Starobelsk Lugansk region on April 2, 1948 and was subsequently reburied in Nizhny Novgorod, where she and the emperor share a common grave. Three daughters of Nicholas II, besides Olga, had children. N.A. Romanov talked with I.V. Stalin, and wealth Russian Empire were used to strengthen the power of the USSR ...

Wasn't the shooting of the royal family in reality?

According to official history, on the night of July 16-17, 1918 Nikolay Romanov together with his wife and children he was shot. After the burial was opened and the remains were identified in 1998, they were reburied in the tomb of the Peter and Paul Cathedral in St. Petersburg. However, then the ROC did not confirm their authenticity.

“I cannot rule out that the church will recognize the royal remains as genuine if convincing evidence of their authenticity is found and if the examination is open and honest,” Metropolitan Hilarion of Volokolamsk said in July this year.

As you know, the ROC did not participate in the burial in 1998 of the remains of the royal family, explaining that the church not sure, whether the original remains of the royal family are buried. ROC refers to the book of the Kolchak investigator Nikolay Sokolov, who concluded that all the bodies were burned. Some of the remains collected by Sokolov at the burning site are stored in Brussels, in the temple of Saint Job the Long-suffering, and they have not been investigated. At one time, a variant of the note was found Yurovsky, who directed the execution and burial - it became the main document before the transfer of the remains (together with the book of the investigator Sokolov). And now, in the coming year of the 100th anniversary of the execution of the Romanov family, the ROC has been instructed to give a final answer to all the dark places of the execution near Yekaterinburg. To obtain a final answer, research has been carried out under the auspices of the Russian Orthodox Church for several years. Again historians, geneticists, graphologists, pathologists and other specialists double-check the facts, powerful scientific forces and the forces of the prosecutor's office are again involved, and all these actions are happening again. under a thick veil of secrecy.

Research on genetic identification is carried out by four independent groups of scientists. Two of them are foreign, working directly with the Russian Orthodox Church. In early July 2017, the secretary of the church commission for the study of the results of the study of the remains found near Yekaterinburg, bishop Egorievsky Tikhon (Shevkunov) said: a large number of new circumstances and new documents have been revealed. For example, an order was found Sverdlov about the execution of Nicholas II. In addition, according to the results of recent research, criminologists have confirmed that the remains of the tsar and tsarina belong to them, since a trace was suddenly found on the skull of Nicholas II, which is interpreted as a trace from a saber strike he received when he visited Japan. As for the queen, she was identified by dentists by the world's first porcelain veneers on platinum pins.

Although, if you open the conclusion of the commission, written before the burial of 1998, it says: the bones of the sovereign's skull are so destroyed, that the characteristic callus cannot be found... The same conclusion noted severe damage to teeth the alleged remains of Nicholas with periodontal disease, since this the person has never been to the dentist. This confirms that the tsar was not shot, since there are records of the Tobolsk dentist, to whom Nikolai contacted. In addition, I have not yet found an explanation for the fact that the growth of the skeleton of "Princess Anastasia" is 13 centimeters more than her lifetime growth. Well, as you know, miracles happen in the church ... Shevkunov did not say a word about genetic examination, and this despite the fact that genetic studies in 2003, conducted by Russian and American specialists, showed that the genome of the body of the alleged empress and her sister Elizaveta Fedorovna do not match, which means no relationship.

Also in the city museum Otsu(Japan) there are things left after being wounded by the policeman of Nicholas II. They contain biological material that can be examined. According to them, Japanese geneticists from the Tatsuo Nagai group proved that the DNA of the remains of "Nicholas II" from near Yekaterinburg (and his family) does not match 100% with DNA from biomaterials from Japan. During the Russian DNA examination, second cousins ​​were compared, and in the conclusion it was written that "there are coincidences." The Japanese, on the other hand, compared the relatives of their cousins. There are also the results of the genetic examination of the President of the International Forensic Association, Mr. Bonte from Dusseldorf, in which he proved: the found remains and doubles of the family of Nicholas II Filatovs- relatives. Perhaps, from their remains in 1946, the "remains of the royal family" were created? The problem has not been studied.

Earlier, in 1998, the ROC based on these conclusions and facts did not recognize the existing remains are genuine, but what will happen now? In December, all the conclusions of the Investigative Committee and the ROC commission will be considered by the Bishops' Council. It is he who will decide on the attitude of the church to the Yekaterinburg remains. Let's see why everything is so nervous and what is the history of this crime?

It's worth fighting for that kind of money

Today, part of the Russian elite suddenly woke up interest in one very juicy story of relations between Russia and the United States, connected with the royal family of the Romanovs... In short, this story is as follows: more than 100 years ago, in 1913, in the United States was created Federal Reserve System(FRS) - the central bank and printing press for the production of international currency, which is still in operation today. The Fed was created for the League of Nations (now UN) and would be a single world financial center with its own currency. Russia contributed to the "authorized capital" of the system 48,600 tons of gold... But the Rothschilds demanded from the then re-elected president of the United States Woodrow Wilson transfer the center to their private property along with the gold.

The organization became known as the FRS, where Russia owned 88.8%, and 11.2% to 43 international beneficiaries. Receipts stating that 88.8% of gold assets for a period of 99 years are under the control of the Rothschilds, in six copies were transferred to the family Nicholas II. The annual income on these deposits was fixed at 4%, which was supposed to be transferred to Russia annually, but settled on the X-1786 account of the World Bank and on 300 thousand - accounts in 72 international banks. All these documents, confirming the right to the gold pledged by the Federal Reserve from Russia in the amount of 48,600 tons, as well as income from leasing it, the mother of Tsar Nicholas II, Maria Feodorovna Romanova, deposited in one of the Swiss banks. But only heirs have access conditions there, and this access controlled by the Rothschild clan... For the gold provided by Russia, gold certificates were issued, which made it possible to reclaim the metal in parts - the tsarist family hid them in different places. Later, in 1944, Bretton Woods conference confirms Russia's right to 88% of the Fed's assets.

This "golden" issue was once proposed to be dealt with by two well-known "Russian" oligarchs - Roman Abramovich and Boris Berezovsky... But Yeltsin “did not understand” them, and now, apparently, that “golden” time has come ... And now this gold is remembered more and more often - though not at the state level.

Some speculate that the escaped Tsarevich Alexei later grew up to become Soviet Prime Minister Alexei Kosygin.

For this gold they kill, fight and make fortunes on it

Today's researchers believe that all wars and revolutions in Russia and in the world occurred due to the fact that the Rothschild clan and the United States did not intend to return the gold to the Federal Reserve System of Russia. After all, the shooting of the royal family made it possible for the Rothschild clan not give away gold and not pay for its 99-year lease... “Now out of three Russian copies of the agreement on the gold invested in the FRS, two are in our country, the third is presumably in one of the Swiss banks,” the researcher said. Sergey Zhilenkov... - In a cache, in the Nizhny Novgorod region, there are documents from the tsar's archives, among which there are 12 "gold" certificates. If you present them, then the world financial hegemony of the United States and the Rothschilds will simply collapse, and our country will receive huge money and all the opportunities for development, since it will no longer be strangled from overseas, ”the historian is sure.

Many wanted to close the questions about the tsar's assets with the reburial. At the professor Vladlena Sirotkina there is also an estimate for the so-called military gold, exported to the First World War and Civil war to the West and East: Japan - $ 80 billion, Great Britain - 50 billion, France - 25 billion, USA - 23 billion, Sweden - 5 billion, Czech Republic - 1 billion. Total - 184 billion. Surprisingly, but officials for example, the US and UK do not dispute these numbers, but surprised by the lack of requests from Russia. By the way, the Bolsheviks remembered about Russian assets in the West in the early 1920s. Back in 1923, the People's Commissar for Foreign Trade Leonid Krasin ordered a British search law firm to assess Russian real estate and cash deposits abroad. By 1993, the firm reported that it had already amassed a $ 400 billion databank! And this is legitimate Russian money.

Why did the Romanovs die? Britain did not accept them!

There is a long-term study, unfortunately, of the already deceased professor Vladlen Sirotkin (MGIMO) "Foreign gold of Russia" (Moscow, 2000), where the gold and other holdings of the Romanov family, accumulated in the accounts of Western banks, are also estimated at no less than 400 billion dollars, and together with investments - more than 2 trillion dollars! In the absence of heirs from the Romanovs, the closest relatives are members of the English royal family ... These are whose interests may be the background of many events of the 19th and 21st centuries ... By the way, it is unclear (or, on the contrary, understandable) why the royal house of England refused the family three times The Romanovs in the shelter. First time in 1916, at an apartment Maxim Gorky, an escape was planned - the rescue of the Romanovs by kidnapping and internment of the royal couple during their visit to an English warship, which was then sent to Great Britain.

The second was the request Kerensky which was also rejected. Then the request of the Bolsheviks was not accepted either. And this despite the fact that mothers George V and Nicholas II were sisters. In the surviving correspondence, Nicholas II and George V call each other "Nicky's cousin" and "Georgie's cousin" - they were cousins ​​with an age difference less than three years, and in their youth, these guys spent a lot of time together and were very similar in appearance. As for the queen, her mother is a princess Alice was the eldest and beloved daughter of the Queen of England Victoria... At that time, in England, as collateral for war loans, there were 440 tons of gold from the gold reserves of Russia and 5.5 tons of personal gold of Nicholas II. Now think about it: if the royal family died, then who would get the gold? The closest relatives! Isn't that the reason cousin Georgie's family refused to admit cousin Nicky? To get gold, its owners had to die. Officially. And now all this must be connected with the burial of the royal family, which will officially testify that the owners of untold riches are dead.

Versions of life after death

All versions of the death of the royal family that exist today can be divided into three.

First version: near Yekaterinburg, the royal family was shot, and its remains, with the exception of Alexei and Maria, were reburied in St. Petersburg. The remains of these children were found in 2007, all examinations were carried out on them, and they, apparently, will be buried on the day of the 100th anniversary of the tragedy. When confirming this version, for accuracy, it is necessary to once again identify all the remains and repeat all examinations, especially genetic and pathological ones.

Second version: The royal family was not shot, but was scattered across Russia and all family members died a natural death, having lived their lives in Russia or abroad, while in Yekaterinburg a family of twins was shot (members of the same family or people from different families, but similar to family members emperor). Nicholas II had doubles after Bloody Sunday 1905. When leaving the palace, three carriages were leaving. In which of them Nicholas II was sitting is unknown. These doubles, the Bolsheviks, having seized the archive of the 3rd department in 1917, had. There is an assumption that one of the families of doubles - the Filatovs, who are distantly related to the Romanovs - followed them to Tobolsk.

Here is one of the versions of the historian of the royal family, Sergei Zhelenkov, which seems to us the most logical, albeit very unusual.

Before investigator Sokolov, the only investigator who published a book about the shooting of the royal family, investigators worked Malinovsky, Nametkin(his archive was burned down along with his house), Sergeev(removed from the case and killed), general- Lieutenant Dieterichs, Kirsta... All these investigators concluded that the royal family was not killed. Neither red nor white wanted to disclose this information - they understood that they were primarily interested in obtaining objective information. American bankers. The Bolsheviks were interested in the tsar's money, and Kolchak declared himself the Supreme Ruler of Russia, which could not be with a living tsar.

Investigator Sokolov handled two cases - one on the fact of murder and the other on the fact of disappearance. In parallel, the military intelligence in the person of Kirsta... When the whites left Russia, Sokolov, fearing for the collected materials, sent them to Harbin- on the way, some of its materials were lost. Sokolov's materials contained evidence of the financing of the Russian revolution by American bankers Schiff, Kuhn and Loeb, and Ford, who was in conflict with these bankers, became interested in these materials. He even summoned Sokolov from France, where he settled, to the United States. When returning from the USA to France Nikolai Sokolov was killed. Sokolov's book was published after his death, and above it Many people have "worked hard", removing many scandalous facts from there, so it cannot be considered completely truthful.

The surviving members of the royal family were watched by people from the KGB, where a special department was created for this, which was disbanded during perestroika. The archive of this department has been preserved. Saved the royal family Stalin- the royal family was evacuated from Yekaterinburg through Perm to Moscow and came to the disposal Trotsky, then the people's commissar of defense. To further save the royal family, Stalin carried out a whole operation, stealing it from Trotsky's people and taking them to Sukhumi, to a specially built house next to the former house of the royal family. From there, all family members were distributed to different places, Maria and Anastasia were taken to the Glinskaya desert (Sumy region), then Maria was transported to the Nizhny Novgorod region, where she died of illness on May 24, 1954. Anastasia subsequently married Stalin's personal bodyguard and lived very secluded on a small farm, died

June 27, 1980 in the Volgograd region. The eldest daughters, Olga and Tatiana, were sent to the Seraphim-Diveevsky convent - the empress was settled not far from the girls. But they did not live here for long. Olga, having traveled through Afghanistan, Europe and Finland, settled in Vyritsa, Leningrad Region, where she died on January 19, 1976. Tatyana lived partly in Georgia, partly on the territory of the Krasnodar Territory, was buried in the Krasnodar Territory, died on September 21, 1992. Alexey and his mother lived at their dacha, then Alexey was transported to Leningrad, where he was "given" a biography, and the whole world recognized him as a party and Soviet leader Alexey Nikolaevich Kosygin(Stalin sometimes called him in front of everyone prince). Nicholas II lived and died in Nizhny Novgorod (December 22, 1958), and the queen died in the village of Starobelsk Lugansk region on April 2, 1948 and was subsequently reburied in Nizhny Novgorod, where she and the emperor share a common grave. Three daughters of Nicholas II, besides Olga, had children. N.A. Romanov talked with I.V. Stalin, and the wealth of the Russian Empire was used to strengthen the power of the USSR ...

There was no execution of the Tsar's family! New data 2014

Falsification of the Execution of the royal family Sychev V

More detailed and a variety of information about the events taking place in Russia, Ukraine and other countries of our beautiful planet, can be obtained at Internet Conferences, constantly held on the website "Keys of Knowledge". All Conferences are open and completely free... We invite all those waking up and interested ...

Representatives of the Investigative Committee told Patriarch Kirill at a meeting in the Danilov Monastery on June 14 about the interim results of the identification of the remains, which, presumably, belong to the executed members of the family of the last Russian Tsar Nicholas II.

The meeting was attended by members of a special patriarchal commission to study the results of the study of the remains.

The secretary of the commission, the vicar of the Holy Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia, spoke about the results of the meeting in the Danilovsky Monastery, the attitude of the Russian Orthodox Church to the discussion around the authenticity of the "Yekaterinburg remains" and the immediate plans of the patriarchal commission to publish the results of the examination in a short interview with TASS after the meeting, Bishop of Yegoryevsk Tikhon (Shevkunov).

Vladyka Tikhon, how did today's meeting go, who took part in it, and what issues, besides the report of the representatives of the Investigative Committee, were discussed there?

The meeting with His Holiness the Patriarch was devoted to discussing the interim results of the investigation by the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation into the murder of the Tsar's family and the results of the work of the Moscow Patriarchate commission, which is studying the same topic within the framework of the tasks set by the Holy Patriarch.

Since 2015, new and previous examinations on this issue are being studied. Special attention is paid to the most thorough historical examination, questions for which have been prepared both by the experts-historians themselves and by the Investigative Committee. The list of questions was presented to the patriarchal commission also from representatives of the public.

- Who from the public presented questions to the commission?

They are famous researchers in their field: Leonid Bolotin, Anatoly Stepanov. They submitted a list of questions to the patriarchal commission. This is very interesting topics and questions. They are taken for study along with the rest.

It is known that some members of the public, including the historian and publicist Leonid Bolotin you mentioned, adhere to the version that the remains of the Romanov family do not exist, and are not going to recognize the results of the examination, whatever they may be. How does the church view the debate over the authenticity of the remains?

The tasks of the patriarchal commission, of which I am the secretary, do not include the recognition or non-recognition of the remains. The instruction given to us by the Holy Patriarch is to conduct, together with the investigation, independent, objective and verifiable, that is, verifiable examinations in the case of the murder of the family of holy martyrs and their faithful companions. The results of the forensic, genetic, anthropological and historical-archival examinations will be presented for the conciliar judgment of the church.

Only the conciliar reason of the Orthodox Church is authorized to make a judgment regarding church veneration or disrespect for the "Yekaterinburg remains" as holy relics. Before that, all other judgments, of course, can take place, since today research continues, and therefore a very important discussion continues.

This is welcome. In what form these judgments are expressed is a question, if one can say, to the genre of the same discussion: in Russia, polemics often take place in very categorical and harsh forms. I do not see anything unusual in this.

Remains of the royal family in Yekaterinburg, 1998

The meeting with the patriarch was held behind closed doors, but nevertheless, could you tell us in the most general terms about its results?

There were so many interesting things in the reports and messages, in the debates and presentations that, with all my desire, I cannot retell it in a short interview: the meeting with the patriarch lasted about five hours.

Now we simply do not have the right to divulge the secret of the investigation: all the experts gave the subscriptions and obligations required by our Criminal Procedure Code.

But with regard to what happened after the meeting with the leadership and experts of the Investigative Committee, here I can report what may be of interest to everyone who follows this topic. At the end of the main conference, His Holiness gathered the participants present from the patriarchal commission.

Here it was proposed and decided to ask the Investigative Committee for permission to publish those materials of the investigation, the examination of which has been completed. The Commission will also ask the RF IC for permission for permanent and involved experts to give interviews and comments on questions and topics, answers to which have already been received, even before the end of the investigation.

We very much hope for the consent of the Investigative Committee, and then it will be possible to organize in the most various forms constructive discussion on new and previously available facts and versions.

Did previously unknown facts come to light in the course of the investigation, examinations and research, and when will it be possible to see the first publications of the results of the examination?

Yes, they showed up. And there are a lot of them. That's all that can be said for now. If the permission of the Investigative Committee is received, then the first publications will be available this summer.

Interviewed by Gleb Bryanskiy

The Russian Orthodox Church still does not recognize that the "Yekaterinburg remains" may belong to the royal family canonized by it. Perhaps, soon the ROC will nevertheless begin to consider them as holy relics.

The Russian Orthodox Church promises to publish in the summer of 2017 the first results of the examination of the "Yekaterinburg remains", presumably belonging to the family of the last Russian emperor Nicholas II, if the Investigative Committee gives its consent, reports TASS with reference to the RF IC and the secretary of the Patriarchal Commission to study the results of the examination of Bishop Tikhon of Yegoryevsk (Shevkunova).

On June 14, at the Danilov Monastery (Patriarchal residence), a meeting was held under the chairmanship of Patriarch Kirill on the question of establishing the identity of the remains found in 1993 in the vicinity of Yekaterinburg. The meeting was attended by a delegation of the Investigative Committee headed by Alexander Bastrykin and members of a special church commission headed by Metropolitan Varsonofy of St. Petersburg and Ladoga.

Bastrykin told Patriarch Kirill about the interim results of the identification of the remains - about the results of the examinations appointed in the framework of the criminal case.

"After the meeting, the members of the Patriarchal Commission decided to ask the Investigative Committee for permission to publish the materials of the investigation, the examination of which has been completed," Bishop Tikhon told the agency. "If permission is received, then this summer," he added, answering a question about the timing of the possible publication of the results of the examination.

"There were so many interesting things in the reports and messages, in the debates and presentations that, with all my desire, I cannot retell it in a short interview: the meeting with the patriarch lasted about five hours," Vladyka shared. He explained that he had no right to divulge the secret of the investigation.

Bishop Tikhon noted that in the course of the investigation, examinations and research, previously unknown facts were discovered, and a lot is all that he is on this moment can say. But when the consent of the UK is received, a constructive discussion on new and previously existing facts and versions will begin in various forms, the representative of the Russian Orthodox Church promised.

The last Russian emperor Nicholas II abdicated the throne on March 2, 1917. Together with his family, he was shot on the night of June 16-17, 1918 in Yekaterinburg by the decision of the Ural Council of Workers and Peasants' Deputies, controlled by the Bolsheviks.

In 1993, near Yekaterinburg, in the Ganina Yama area, remains were found, presumably belonging to the emperor and his relatives. Russian authorities the bodies were officially recognized as the remains of the royal family. They were buried in the Peter and Paul Fortress.

In 2000, the Russian Orthodox Church canonized Nicholas II and his family, after which the discussion about the authenticity of the remains intensified. Indeed, if confirmed, the remains should be venerated as holy relics. However, the Russian Orthodox Church did not find sufficient grounds to recognize the remains of the canonized Romanovs as relics.

In order to carry out a complex of examinations, including historical, genetic, anthropological for the indisputable identification of the dead, in 2015 a criminal case was opened on the death of family members of the Russian imperial house of the Romanovs and the remains of Nicholas II and Empress Alexandra Feodorovna were exhumed in the Peter and Paul Cathedral in St. Petersburg. ...

Also, blood samples were taken for the examination of the grandfather of Emperor Nicholas II - Emperor Alexander II, who died during a terrorist attack in 1881 - from his uniform stored in the Hermitage. After the completion of all examinations, the question of the authenticity of the remains will be submitted to the Council of the Russian Orthodox Church.

According to Bishop Tikhon, the commission will ask the UK for permission for permanent and involved experts even before the end of the investigation for interviews and comments on questions and topics, answers to which have already been received, in order to facilitate public discussion.

"Only the conciliar reason is authorized to make a judgment regarding church veneration or disrespect for the" Yekaterinburg remains "as relics Orthodox Church... Before that, all other judgments, of course, can take place, since today research continues, and therefore a very important discussion continues. This can only be welcomed, "Bishop Tikhon explained.

At the same time, many believers and some experts adhere to the version that the bodies of those killed were completely destroyed.